Yesterday I
attended a debate arguing whether Bradford should have an elected mayor or not. These
are some highlights and pictures from the event. It was my first political
hustings I have attended, and I didn't really know what to expect. A 'hustings' basically means a place where political campaign speeches are made.
Jeanette Sunderland,
who is with the Liberal Democrats, was against having an elected mayor, because
she thought such a person would have too much power, and if there was an elected mayor
it would be more likely to be a man who was quite wealthy - even though our current mayor is a woman?
Another incident during Sunderland’s speech was at a point when she asked the crowd “who actually voted in the last local election?” she assumed hardly anybody had, therefore, they probably would not vote for an elected mayor. But she was slightly taken aback when at least 75% of the crowd sitting there put their hand up. But people who attend hustings are normally very political, so therefore are more likely to vote.
The only
people who were in support of an elected mayor were Alyas Karmani from the
Respect party and Simon Cooke from the Conservative party. I noticed when Alyas
Karmani was delivering his speech, David
Green from the Labour party (who was against an elected mayor) was blatantly on
his phone.
Alyas
Karmani gave quite a good speech; first he criticised the current councils for
their consistent failings. He then stated what a Mayor’s role should be and
explained they are a “voice for the entire city and a champion”. He also
questioned why Ian Greenwood had not attended the debate and it was as if the “council was being run by Laurel and Hardy!”
There was some
heckling during the debate, especially when it was time to ask questions
because the Chair, Ratna Latchman, gave everyone the chance to air their
thoughts, despite the fast pace of the discussion, and managed to tie things
together quite neatly!
Overall,
there wasn’t a huge turnout, and I expected some drama and possibly a fight.
But it was quite a good experience and I would probably go again because you
sort of get a feel for the process and if I hadn’t gone I probably wouldn’t
know how the process works.
Brilliant analysis of the event. Keep it up
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment!
DeleteReally straight to the point and informative...so much messy information our there - this is one thing I actually understood!
ReplyDeleteThank you =)
Thank you and yes I agree with you, sometimes people put information that isn't very relevant and superfluous =D
Delete